Main Article Content

Isis Vivas Pivat
María Gorety Rodríguez Vieira

Introduction: The rural digital divide undermines the right to learn and extends beyond the mere lack of infrastructure. Objective: To analyze the strategic scenarios required to overcome the digital divide in rural areas, with an emphasis on teachers’ digital competence and technological sovereignty. Method: A qualitative, descriptive-exploratory approach was adopted, involving a systematic literature review that combined content analysis with a synthesis matrix based on 37 sources indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, multilateral organization documents, and experiences from Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, and Spain. Results: The findings identify the digital divide in pedagogical appropriation (third-level digital divide) as a key obstacle, exacerbated by professional isolation and the disconnect between national agendas and local realities. On this basis, three scenarios are proposed: sovereign infrastructure and offline technologies; learning ecosystems connected to local contexts; and teacher empowerment through rural communities of practice. Conclusion: Educational justice in rural areas requires resilient, context-sensitive digitalization governed at the local level.

Introducción: La brecha digital rural vulnera el derecho a aprender y trasciende la mera ausencia de infraestructura. Objetivo: Analizar los escenarios estratégicos necesarios para superar la brecha digital en las áreas rurales, con énfasis en la competencia digital docente y la soberanía tecnológica. Método: Se aplicó enfoque cualitativo descriptivo-exploratorio con revisión bibliográfica sistemática, articulando análisis de contenido con matriz de Síntesis a partir de 37 fuentes indexadas en Scopus y Web of Science, documentos multilatinos y experiencias Ecuador‑Colombia‑Perú‑España. Resultados: Los hallazgos identifican la brecha de apropiación pedagógica (tercer nivel) como obstáculo determinante, agravado por aislamiento profesional y desconexión agendas nacionales‑realidades. Sobre esta base se proponen tres escenarios: infraestructura soberana y tecnologías offline, ecosistemas de aprendizaje vinculados al territorio y empoderamiento docente mediante comunidades de práctica rurales. Conclusión: La justicia educativa rural exige digitalización resiliente, situada y gobernada desde el territorio.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vivas Pivat, I., & Rodríguez Vieira, M. G. (2026). Rural Educational Foresight: Strategic Scenarios to Bridge Digital Divides and Guarantee the Right to Learn. Alternancia - Revista De Educación E Investigación, 8(15), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37260/alternancia.v8n15.07
Section
CASE STUDIES
Referencias

Admiraal, W., Louws, M., Lockhorst, D., Paas, T., Buynsters, M., Cviko, A., Janssen, C., de Jonge, M., Nouwens, S., Post, L. S., van der Ven, F., & Kester, L. (2017). Teachers in school-based technology innovations: A typology of their beliefs on teaching and technology. Computers & Education, 114, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.013

Anderson, K. D. (2008). Transformational teacher leadership in rural schools. The Rural Educator, 29(3), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v29i3.462

Anlimachie, M. A., Avoada, C., & Amoako-Mensah, T. (2022). Leapfrogging inequality strategies for transformed rural education: A school district case, Ghana. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 32(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.47381/aijre.v32i1.282

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Chen, R. S., & Liu, I. F. (2013). Research on the effectiveness of information technology in reducing the rural–urban knowledge divide. Computers & Education, 63, 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.002

Chiu, T. K. F., Falloon, G., Song, Y., Wong, V. W. L., Zhao, L., & Ismailov, M. (2024). A self-determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development. Computers & Education, 214, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017

Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2021). La brecha digital y la transformación digital en el mundo rural. Naciones Unidas. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/47225-brecha-digital-transformacion-digital-mundo-rural

Chen, R.-S., & Liu, I.-F. (2013). Research on the effectiveness of information technology in reducing the rural-urban knowledge divide. Computers & Education, 63, 437-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.002

Dille, K. B., & Røkenes, F. M. (2021). Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Fütterer, T., Hoch, E., Lachner, A., Scheiter, K., & Stürmer, K. (2023). High-quality digital distance teaching during COVID-19 school closures: Does familiarity with technology matter? Computers & Education, 199, 104788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104788

Goodpaster, K. P. S., Adedokun, O. A., & Weaver, G. C. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention. The Rural Educator, 33(3), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.408

Gore, J., Lloyd, A., Smith, M., Bowe, J., Ellis, H., & Lubans, D. (2017). Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.007

Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942

Heitink, M. C., Voogt, J. M., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers & Education, 101, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.009

Krajewski, B. (2005). [Review of the book What is world literature?, by D. Damrosch]. College Literature, 32(4), 234–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2005.0060

Li, M. (2025). Exploring the digital divide in primary education: A comparative study of urban and rural mathematics teachers’ TPACK and attitudes towards technology integration in post-pandemic China. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1913–1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12890-x

Liu, S.-M., Huang, Y.-C., & Wang, R.-J. (2024). Challenges and professional support for principals at rural schools for sustainable development. Sustainability, 16(21), 9251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219251

Naik, G., Chitre, C., Bhalla, M., & Rajan, J. (2020). Impact of use of technology on student learning outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale experiment in India. World Development, 127, 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104736

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Reimaginar juntos nuestros futuros: Un nuevo contrato social para la educación. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Mending the education divide: Getting strong teachers to the schools that need them most. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92b75874-en

Philip, L., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Williams, F., & Ashmore, F. (2017). The digital divide: Patterns, policy and scenarios for connecting the ‘final few’ in rural communities across Great Britain. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.002

Quaicoe, J. S., & Pata, K. (2020). Teachers’ digital literacy and digital activity as digital divide components among basic schools in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4077–4095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10158-8

Roberts, E., Anderson, B. A., Skerratt, S., & Farrington, J. (2017). A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.001

Stelmach, B. L. (2012). A synthesis of international rural education issues and responses. The Rural Educator, 32(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v32i2.432

Sun, X., Zhou, J., Liu, L. B., & Li, Q. (2024). Teacher resilience development in rural Chinese schools: Patterns and cultural influences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 147, Article 104656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104656

Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007

van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004

Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E. H., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Rural teachers’ sharing of digital educational resources: From motivation to behavior. Computers & Education, 161, 104055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104055

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262232241/technology-and-social-inclusion/